re: #131 Aceofwhat?

immoral

re: #130 Killgore Trout

Hmmm…I wonder how that sentence concluded.

Here’s how it reads:

He was insistent on the question of the morality of murdering members of congress, framing his inquiry in the mechanics of personal privilege. Bill’s weak suits are law and history, and thus he was exploring as much as pontificating. In the end we concluded that capping your congress critter was indeed illegal, but in certain circumstance morally justified if not actually an imperative.

First link here to the original article.