re: #134 Walter L. Newton

That was my biggest problem with the site. You probably understand, but it’s hard to explain. I seen artifact after artifact, glyphs after glyphs, standing stones after standing stones and so on.

Something just doesn’t look right about this site. The site itself looks like it’s ancient, but it appears to have be peppered with a lot of fanciful pieces.

And I can’t find much more on the site except what has been initially released by the German.

IMHO.

Yeah, I am thinking there are layers of influence seen here. The disproportionality of some of the carvings are definitely pre-Alexandrian, but there are parts where there might be some Hellenistic influence, if it’s for real then it evolved and was reworked over time I think. That’s not highly unusual for temples.