re: #133 sattv4u2

It’s location alone “implies” that there would be an increase in security risks

Simply because we transfer a few more prisoners there, to add to the ones already there?
It’ll have exactly the same security status it always did. One dependent upon events in Afghanistan, not on whether we have 150 vs 200 detainees. *
* I don’t actually know how many are there.

We appear to agree that holding anyone at Bagram is a bad idea, so I don’t really know what you want to argue at this point.