re: #135 Buck

This is all part of the Zelig in him. He gets to have it both ways.

He does not support same-sex weddings and believes “marriage is between a man and a woman”.

But also gets to be opposed to a proposition on the ballot in California that would change the state constitution to overturn a ruling that recently gave gay couples the right to marry.

This makes both sides happy, for awhile, and then it just makes both sides mad.

What’s wrong with believing that marriage is between a man and a woman, but that the government should have no stance on who can’t and can’t get married?