re: #134 Gus 802

BTW, I don’t believe that the Anon, as an organization (as amorphous as it is) would do something like that. No real reason. That said, I don’t discount it completely, so I wouldn’t have gotten on KT’s case if I didn’t read his comments as saying that yeah, the Anon certainly did it (e.g. #55). Which might have been an erroneous reading. So, probably it was a miscommunication. Which is harder to mend since the time when KT and the LGF “mainstream” have gone different ways on OWS and all this split entailed. Pity.