re: #126 b_sharp

An atheist says we can rule out the existence of a god even though it is not possible to logically prove a negative because the preponderance of evidence shows a god is not only not necessary but not possible given the physical laws as we understand them.

If physical laws as we understand them allowed yu to make this claim, you would have a point. However,they do not. How do Maxwell’s equations or QM or SR or chemistry or biology rule out God?

You’ve made a very bold statement. How do you support it?

I will not bother reserving that bit of space because it would be a waste. However if the evidence changes, I will then make room, but the evidence will have to be spectacular and overturn all previous evidence against. I do not expect that to happen.

OK that is fair, but what physical, measurable, scientific evidence do you have against Him?

An atheist is closer to science than an agnostic.

Not unless you can back up your remarkable claim.