re: #141 lawhawk

…cut…

It’s an example of how the Court appears to disregard common sense or factual evidence that doesn’t jibe with the Court’s intended outcome. Heck, it would potentially open the door to suits against even the Court itself for limiting where/how the protesters can protest and interact with the Court, the appellants, and participants. The Court clearly understands that they need to set up the zones for themselves, but ignore those same reasons when it comes to protests that have already shown themselves to have engaged in violence in the past.

…cut…

lawhawk…can I take some of your comment and just call it what I think it is?

Fucking Naive!