re: #142 withak

No, I meant that the tweet Thom was quoting is now protected. Don’t have any context without it.

I think it was just question three of the FAQ on this .pdf

It may have been from another document but that’s what they were talking about, how Hillary’s people were able to turn in so many surrogate votes. Accusations have been flying around today that they canvased retirement homes and such, actually reaching out to older voters who couldn’t otherwise make it to a caucus.

You know, in other words actually trying to do something to fix the grossly undemocratic nature of the caucus system. Apparently in Bernie-Land seeking out the disabled and easily disenfranchised and making sure they have a voice is some kind of nefarious trick.