re: #141 Aceofwhat?

have an upding.

in return, note kindly that the point being made is that Assange committed a crime, not that the appellation of the crime is a meaningful distinction. that’s a point that i imagine an Assange apologist would make, since there is no other reason apart from malignant pedantry to object thus.

and i would never call you a malignant pedant.

Not without your teeth in anyways.