re: #145 Daria Emmons

I think it is fair to say parts of it may be, and are worth looking into. (I have no desire to write a legal brief, so I will skip that exercise)

But it’s one of those cases where the road to perdition is paved with good intentions.

The Civil Rights Act was passed with the best of intentions and was laudable in its goals; whether the Act as a whole is constitutional is a different matter.

Hasn’t there been enough case law on the books to make it fairly accepted?