re: #174 Wendell Zurkowitz ((slave to the waffle light))

I do not fearmonger, my objections to it are 90% economic. But I nonetheless see it as an acceptable stopgap until our technology advances enough that we can dispense with it for good.

Yes, but your economics is bollocks.

You complain that nuclear doesn’t have the insurance to cover the approx one hundred billion loss from Tchernobyl and Fukushima but don’t wonder how fossils can pay for the one hundred and sixty five billion loss for one country in one year.