re: #148 Obdicut

Yes. We know that he was on the SEC forms for legal reasons because he was the CEO, chairman, president, and because he was the sole owner.

So why is there any question of his responsibility for what the firm did while he was CEO, president, chairman, and sole owner? I’m really not understanding what argument you’re attempting to make at this point.

Mitt had a medical condition that prevented him from not signing things.