re: #151 jamesfirecat

Also Ms. Nickolaus…

“For context, it’s worth noting that Kathy Nickolaus is a Republican donor who’s been involved in a series of controversial elections, including a ballot mix-up in 2004, sample ballots in 2005 that accidentally told voters who to vote for, a 2007 incident involving touch-screen voting, and perhaps most importantly, a 2002 controversy in which Nickolaus was granted immunity as part of a criminal investigation into Republican misdeeds in the State Assembly.”

[Link: www.washingtonmonthly.com…]

I’m not saying this automatically means hat the votes are fake… but could you imagine a LESS CONVINCING person to bring forward new votes?

You beat me to it. I was just typing this out, lol.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if this turns into a major fracas. This whole thing is extremely fishy.