re: #150 Charles

Because it was being hyped by blogs like Gateway Pundit that are so far off the rails, no journalist with any sense would want to get close to it.

I’ve been wondering about this. Since it wasn’t really being covered, why did Van Jones resign anyway? I’ve read lots of opinion on the left that felt this should have been ignored since it wasn’t getting any kind of broad play in the MSM, yet it wasn’t. Any theories why?