re: #151 Obdicut

Oh geez.

I didn’t meant that art stops evil, that once you paint a picture of an evil bastard he stops being evil. That’s a ludicrous interpretation.

No more ludicrous than the suggestion that those who take offense to the current and ongoing rehabilitation of Mao fear that evil communist influences can escape from the portraits of said bastards.

No more ludicrous than the suggestion that Warhol’s litho did anything to change the underlying content of the image he attempted to manipulate.