re: #145 iceweasel

Pat, a couple of people have mentioned over the last week that they temporarily couldn’t seem to post in the spinoffs, IIRC.

If that is the kind of thing Pat is referring to, the he should have said so, or framed it as such. I asked for clarification when he posted this, emphasis mine:

re: #62 pat

It is a shame i am not allowed to link here in the topical Spinoff section. This seems a worthy article.

Obama’s Court Jews; the Rise of J Street[Link: www.americanthinker.com…]

He responded with a typical, political non-answer, answer here:

re: #70 pat

SB, apparently my links, primarily scientific, are too controversial. To be more concise, I believe that AGW is entirely unproven. And likely to be considered as likely as Copernicus’ theory of the mathematical certitude of planetary orbits.

Not presenting any evidence as to how he was being prevented from linking, but why he thought he was being prevented from linking. Not a declarative statement about who is preventing him from the privilege of linking in the spinoffs, but rather an odd sort of unsubstantiated guess as to why.

Which, considering his choice of words, sounds much like someone with a persecution complex. Like he has some kind of truth to tell, and someone is stopping him from telling it.

I’ve asked further questions, hoping Pat would clarify what he meant, and received no answer, despite the fact that this thread is moving very slow, and he was still logged in until just recently.

With all that in mind, I am left to conclude that…

Pat is lying in an attempt to cravenly libel our host while playing the role of the victim. I wait for him to prove me wrong.

I still would like for Pat to prove me wrong.