So we have a problem in Nebraska.

Three abortion petitions are circulating which are at odds with each other. At least in theory, two or three could pass with a majority vote.

Under the state constitution if two amendments are at odds with each other, the one with the most votes becomes part of the constitution and the other is thrown out.

The first, by Protect Our Rights Nebraska, would enshrine abortion into the constitution up to foetal viability (twenty-four weeks).

The second, by Protect Women and Children, would prohibit abortion after the first trimester, but would allow the Unicameral to restrict it further.

The third, put forth by Now Choose Life, would grant so-called personhood to an embryo or foetus in a woman’s uterus (avoiding the problem of IVF clinics), requiring the law to treat a foetus as if it was a born child.

The first two seem to have a chance of passing based on state polling. (Out-of-state polling agencies ignore our state.) The third amendment started late but is rapidly gaining ground amongst all Christian sects in the state, so it may make the ballot.

According to the state secretary of state, after the canvassing board completes its work, Gov. Jim Pillen (R-real billionaire Catholic) would have to decide if the referenda are actually in conflict. AG Evnan (R) says it appears to him all three proposals are in hopeless conflict.

The state constitution only grants the governor ministerial powers to convey which amendments have passed. His only duty is to announce the result.

Such an issue of competing amendments has never occurred since the Unicameral and state constitution were formed in the Thirties.