re: #172 SanFranciscoZionist

That’s not a ‘conspiracy’. Everyone has declared their donations and their intentions.

Well you may think that saying that a politician “tells the truth”, that “he is in the employ of mega-rich oligarchs who want to destroy the remaining vestiges of working- and middle-class empowerment” (the second part of #17) is simply a logical step. I however think that is not proven at all. And I say it describes a conspiracy if it were true.

Again, #17 makes it very clear that something was said in the prank phone call, and I don’t see it.