re: #170 EPR-radar

Sullivan should know better than to characterize the attacks on Richwine as based mostly on a premise of “no empirical evidence of IQ differences between broad racial categories”.

Richwine is being criticized mainly for the racist narrative and policies he proposed, and for his shoddy analysis of his data. Denial of the reality of test score differences is a relatively small part of the critiques I’ve seen.

Sullivan admits defending a thesis he has not read. I don’t think he is capable of a cogent analysis even if he did read it, though.