I think what was missed by the last poster was my main thrust, and that is that researchers have had their speech muzzled by the PC higher ups. Can you imagine? Want to comment? Kind of like a black eye for openness would you say? Now as for the paper cited in the debunk article and with fild strength graphed in Fig. 1 reproduced from that paper, the graph doesn’t look flat at all, like the text says it is. Am I missing something?