re: #164 lawhawk

Ah OK. I may have heard the alter ego term once or twice and forgotten it. I didn’t study much corporate law in my courses, and I’m new to The Law in general. :) Reading the memos now… This sounds extraordinarily petty, basing a you-can’t-make-me defense off of a statement in the complaint. I’m eager to read the response.

Edit: I’m enjoying the “This is ridiculous” tone of the response memo… 28-year-old footnote? LOL

My first thought is, if the Baby-Parts Liars affirm they’re not a corporation in order to plead the F-I-F (see Carter, Tron. Statement to the Senate, Sub-Commitee on Narcotics), doesn’t that remove liability protections?