re: #176 Fairly Sure I’m Still Obdicut

Nice to see you still passively-aggressively dodge simple, straightforward questions while making vague claims about outrage that never actually live up to your hype.

Again: Where is the outrage over the article, and what is being found outrageous about it?

The Commentary article by the other Brooks is a weird pastiche of half-formed thoughts and asinine fantasy—like the idea that sociological research on the poor is divorced from actual contact with the poor—but even that article is acknowledging the problem, which is yards better than standards conservative thought.

So how about, just for a hoot, you try answering a straightforwards question like a human being?

Where is the outrage about the article, and what are they finding outrageous about it?

“Outrage” is just a word KT uses when he wants attention. He never uses it to mean what the dictionary says it means.