So, and please correct me if I’m wrong, but it appears to me that the protestors reproduced a picture for their signs, and the reproduction made this victim’s skin tone look darker. Thus they darkened him while proclaiming his innocence, which is exactly the opposite of Riehl’s claim.

How dumb do you have to be to publish something like this anyway? Dan Riehl just proclaimed to the world that he thinks darker skinned blacks are more likely to be guilty of a crime than lighter skinned ones.