re: #181 Targetpractice

Yes, when they walk home. When they decide to confront the vigilante, things go from bad to worse real quickly.

Vigilante followed for no reason, then “suspect” confronted him. I tend to go with the temporal aspect of the case when determining the level of responsibility, ie, vigilante acted first.

Maybe Trayvon was trying to kill Zim and deserved to get shot. None of us know. What we do know is that Zim instigated this by following and then leaving vehicle with gun.

Are you saying that someone who’s being wrongfully followed has no right to confront the vigilante/stalker/whatever?