re: #14 freetoken

OK, here is a topic which divides:

White House hits pause on editing human germline cells

So, what is wrong with being a bit more concious directive in the future of the human population? Does the blurb writer not understand that we’ve been directing our own evolution both conciously and not, through how we select mates, and how we organize our societies?

For the record - I have nothing against designer humans, as long as the techniques can be shown to cause not greater incidence of “birth defects” than currently.

Would it be a bad thing to end the appendix?