re: #190 stabby

I argue with a lot of non-religious wingnuts. They tend to be odd people who share a tribal kinship with the religious nuts, defend the religious nuts and hate all of the official enemies of the religious nuts.

They’re socially members.. and proof that people’s thinking doesn’t have to be consistent.

So, you just contradicted yourself kind of immediately. You said there wouldn’t be wingnuts without religion, and then acknowledged there’s lots of non-religious wingnuts.

So, is this you changing your opinion, or do you somehow really think without the religious wingnuts the non-religious ones would all be cool?