Comment

Joe Scarborough to GOP: 'Man Up' and Confront the Idiot Half-Governor

197
Fozzie Bear11/30/2010 12:17:53 pm PST

This is the kind of thing that worries me:

eweek.com

The Obama administration is working on a proposal that would make it easier for law enforcement and security officials to eavesdrop on online chatter, including e-mail, instant messaging and social networks, reported The New York Times on Sept. 27.

The proposed legislation will likely come before Congress next year.

The White House-sponsored bill would require all Internet-based communication services to be technically capable of complying with a federal wiretap order. This includes being able to intercept and unscramble encrypted messages, said the Times.

It will give the government the ability to listen in on literally every communication anyone makes online.

[snip]

nternet and phone networks are already required to have eavesdropping abilities thanks to a 1994 law called the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act. While extending the wiretap authority to include digital networks and cell phones, and not just copper-wire phone systems, the law does not apply to communications service providers.

Under the current rules, investigators can intercept messages at the network company’s switch. If the user is using a service that encrypts the messages between the computer and the servers, investigators have to go to the communications service provider to view the unscrambled content. While some service providers have the capability to intercept these messages, most do not. According to the Times report, many providers wait until they are served with wiretap orders before developing intercept capabilities.

However, some services, like peer-to-peer instant messaging software, encrypt messages between users, so even the provider cannot unscramble them. The proposed legislation will require these programs to be redesigned so that they can be unscrambled.

“They can promise strong encryption. They just need to figure out how they can provide us plain text,” said Caproni.

This is just about the worst idea imaginable. Illegalizing strong encryption is a very bad idea.