re: #190 wheat-dogghazi-mailgate

And it misses the point of why publishing Balko’s address is at all necessary or ethical. Plus, it opens up the possibility that some of his knuckle-dragging followers will harass the current residents of those addresses.

Oh, his whole premise that you can’t be for social justice if you don’t live in poverty is completely bogus, for sure. (And that HE is righteously charged with exposing those he finds wanting in sanctity.)

I was just pointing out that his cracker-jack research is so pitiful that he usually comes up with the wrong address, or the wrong city, or the wrong person.