The nice thing about being a theocratic fascist is that youāre never troubled by inconsistencies in the messaging or policies.
But the prison agency and the Texas attorney generalās office, which has staked its reputation on ādefending the unbornā all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, are arguing the agency shouldnāt be held responsible for the stillbirth because staff didnāt break the law. Plus, they said, itās not clear that Issaās fetus had rights as a person.
āJust because several statutes define an individual to include an unborn child does not mean that the Fourteenth Amendment does the same,ā the Texas attorney generalās office wrote in a March footnote, referring to the constitutional right to life.
For more than two decades, in legislation passed by lawmakers and defended in court by the attorney generalās office, Texas has insisted āunborn childrenā be recognized as people starting at fertilization. And although it has traditionally referred to all stages of pregnancy, from fertilized egg to birth, as an unborn child, the state repeatedly referred to Issaās stillborn baby as a fetus in legal briefings.
Itās a stark shift in tone from the stateās self-proclaimed status as āa nationwide leader in the protection of the unbornā in the anti-abortion fight. A few months after Issa lost her unborn child, now-suspended Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a press release that he would ācontinue to fight tirelessly for the rights of the unborn.ā Paxton had not yet been impeached and was still at the helm of the agency when the stateās motions in Issaās case were filed.
A prison guard says she was forced to stay at her post during labor pains. Texas is fighting compensation for her stillbirth. (Texas Tribune)