Comment

Tucson and the Case for Involuntary Commitment

2
jaunte1/13/2011 7:44:43 am PST
Second, the law should no longer require, as a condition of involuntary incarceration, that seriously disturbed individuals constitute a danger to themselves or others, let alone a “substantial” or “imminent” danger, as many states do. A delusional loss of contact with reality should be enough to trigger a process that starts with multiple offers of voluntary assistance and ends with involuntary treatment, including commitment if necessary.


The additional step in this, of course, is for communities to be willing to fund sufficient care facilities and personnel from their tax base.