re: #8 charles_martel

I am certainly no Ron Paul fan, but I really don’t see anything inherently wrong with the government being able to examine the books of such a powerful bank. Should their books be permanently hidden from scrutiny?

It seems this has nothing to do with being a Ron Paul fan or what ever. There has been a lot of anti-Paul rhetoric on LGF, but maybe on some issues, we’ve been reading him all wrong. After all, this amendment has over 300 co-sponsors.

On this subject Ron Paul and the Fed, are we to assume all 300 plus co-sponsors are jerks and have no idea what they are doing, or do we have to back off a bit and consider that Paul and his co-sponsors may have a valid issue here?