re: #175 acacia

It’s not only how I see it but I would venture to say that virtually everyone agrees that if the entity being aborted is on par with an appendix, then abortion is perfectly fine because you can do what you will with your body but that on the other hand if it’s on par with a human being then abortion is not fine because it is wrong to kill another. The milion dollar question of course is which is it. You obviously believe it’s on par with an appendix and I’m not expressing my opinion here on that but merely point out that calling one hypocritical requires making a critical assumption.

You would assume wrong. I do not believe it’s on par with an appendix, but I do believe that in the initial stages, it is only a potential human being, not an actual human being.

The point, however, that Charles made is the giant hypocrisy of someone, curiously a male someone, who would like the government to keep their paws of his body, but to hell with women’s bodies.