re: #203 Sic semper evello dildos tyrannis

Didn’t they straight up say in a statement or one of those meetings that the Paiute had no claim?

I’m exceedingly sure they did. Because we mocked it at the time.

I think they made the Randist argument that the Injuns didn’t believe in property, plus they weren’t using it right, so they didn’t have any claim to the land. All of which boils down to “White people wanted it.”