re: #218 LudwigVanQuixote

You are not reading, and you are getting insulting.

Wrong, I am not “getting insulting” I am disputing your assertion with logic and references. To be clear, I am respectfully taking issue with one of your arguments.

Note that Inohofe also got upset when he heard contrary opinions, read the article that was posted, it makes Inohofe look weak and emotional and faith based in the rejection of science, you should avoid following his lead in this.

My criticism stands, your reply is to cast further aspersions on the IPCC report, thus you confirm my assertion that you reject the IPCC scientific consensuses whereas I agree with it.