re: #223 lawhawk

I complain about overspending on national defense, so I have no clue why you appeal to it actually being in the constitution. I didn’t argue against the concept of defense spending, just overspending on it. I know you’re not saying it’s okay to overspend on something because it’s actually spelled out in the constitution*, but it came out sounding like that. So I’m at a loss as to what it is you’re actually saying about defense spending.

*We could have some bitching post roads, then, anyway.