re: #217 Fairly Sure I’m Still Obdicut

Why can’t you name your source? Have you forgotten where you read it, or are you embarrassed because of the shitty quality of your source, or what?

I mean, your previous source for this was an absolutely contemptible article that claimed that defending the VRA was a negative, so I don’t really have that high hopes, but why, days after your original claims, are you still refusing to name your source?

What do you think you gain by obfuscating it?

Honestly, yes, I forgot where I read it.