Comment

Nobody Enjoys the Michael Cohen-Sean Hannity Connection More Than Stephen Colbert

230
KGxvi4/17/2018 3:08:14 pm PDT

re: #222 Jenner7

I have to say, I’m pleasantly surprised by Gorsuch on this case, from SCOTUSBlog’s recap:

Gorsuch concurred in part and concurred in the judgment. He emphasized at the outset that “[v]ague laws invite arbitrary power.” He defended the originalist foundations for vagueness challenges that Justice Clarence Thomas questioned at length in his dissent, tracing the history of those challenges back to Blackstone’s condemnation of vague statutes and the “tradition of courts refusing to apply vague statutes.” He further noted that the concern with vague statutes was not “confined to the most serious offenses like capital crimes.” Addressing the government’s argument that a more lenient standard of review should apply in civil cases, Gorsuch would have gone even further than the plurality. He suggested that provisions of civil laws should be scrutinized closely for vagueness even outside the deportation context: “Why, for example, would due process require Congress to speak more clearly when it seeks to deport a lawfully resident alien than when it wishes to subject a citizen to indefinite civil commitment, strip him of a business license essential to his family’s living, or confiscate his home?”

Vaguely written law makes it very easy to prosecute people who were acting in good faith. Granted, that’s not the case with Dimaya, where he had two burglary convictions, but that’s typical of cases involving due process.