re: #154 Sharmuta

But that hasn’t stopped certain people from threatening Charles with lawyers.

Perhaps it’s from having watched this play out elsewhere- threatening legal action in the hopes it will intimidate your critic(s). I have no idea if that’s what is going on here- I don’t know the facts in this case. There’s no need to sue if the facts will exonerate her, though. In fact- if the blogger is lying, the blogger will be the one to lose credibility- without lawyers being involved at all.

Not true. As I said in another post, the facts of her repeated exoneration from bogus investigations have seen no editorial play at all.

I do NOT think she’s ‘silencing critics’. I think this is about the only way someone like Palin has of getting the truth out.