re: #207 lawhawk

And bear in mind that the original 1993 WTC bombers sought to blow up the WTC using a bomb that had a chemical weapons component but thankfully that part vaporized in the explosion rather than be spread throughout the buildings.

Well, that’s exactly what I mean. Delivery of chemical weapons is very, very complicated. They’re, in general, more ineffective than explosives in nearly every way, and I’d rather a terrorist group spent money on a chemical warhead with a high chance of not working and a lower death toll than a conventional weapon that would, for the same amount of money, cause more death and destruction.