RE: #147

My poor ludwig, I never said the peer review process was wrong for what it was designed to so (review theories and gender scientific debate). What I said is it is completely insufficient to the phase where you go into policies or programs that impact massive numbers of humanity.

I said, that when you go from debating theories to imposing laws and systems, the peer review process is completely inadequate to challenge the findings and drive out bullet proof results. When you get into the real world, you need to withstand challenges. It would be like trying to rely on an airplane or space vehicle that went through journal peer review versus the much more rigorous and demanding system design process.

Laughably, you were the one who claimed Einstein went through peer review! Too funny.