Also, note that Roberts himself heard an extremely similar case to Citizens United just two years ago. And yet he managed to avoid a facial challenge to all campaign finance laws just fine. Go look up Wisconsin Right to Life vs. FEC, from the year 2006.

Roberts managed to write that opinion without completely gutting 100 years of campaign finance law. Things have changed that dramatically in 2 years that Roberts now felt it appropriate to completely expand the scope of an as-applied challenge to a facial challenge?