re: #233 Gus 802

Thanks. So he see intelligent design as a threat.

My head hurts.

He seems to be a supporter, in the ‘just asking questions’ column:

You can label those scientists who support Intelligent Design religious zealots if you wish. But at least they are being intellectual honest by admitting evolution’s flaws and offering other explanations for consideration. Would that be a crime or unconstitutional? And does two paragraphs in a 700-page textbook equal government support of religion? Please????

Intelligent Design supporters don’t want or need to have it etched in stone wiping out Darwin’s evolutionary matrix. They just want it footnoted in an honest fashion so if today’s young scientist happen to turn the stone over and it says, “made in heaven” they won’t be too shocked!
usmessageboard.com