re: #225 allegro

Not to pick on you but just the fact that all are discussing this using the term “sex object” is the core of the problem, isn’t it?

Yeah, but I don’t know of another term that conveys the same meaning without the pejorative connotation. PART of the job is to be attractive young women in revealing clothes, to be admired for their attractiveness. I don’t think one can reasonably deny that part of the job description.

My point is - So they’re sex objects. SO WHAT? That doesn’t mean they’ve consented to all the stuff described in the article.