re: #236 saik0max0r

You’re so brilliant, your IQ passed by your sense of humor four times before disappearing up your ass.

I happen to have a degree in atmosphurric chemastriy. (I purposely spelled that incorrectly…in case you need it spelled out for you.)

FWIW, I wrote the software used in the very first *portable* aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer. (I spelled that part right, just for you.) and I’ve seen my work used to reach conclusions that both support portions of AGW theory and conclusions that have tended not to support current theory. It’s all good.

But tell me this: How much of this atmospheric chemical research ends up in the most popular climate models?

I eagerly await the results of your fruitless google searching.

Hey jerk, no one was foul mouthed with you, so why don’t you take a little of your own advice “As long as sin doesn’t include drinking, fornicating, smoking, cussing, and piracy, I’m all for Theocracy!”

Hypocrite…