re: #238 windsagio

So you’re shocked that agencies waste money in politically expedient ways?

No, I’m shocked that the MET office has been one of the many go to sources for pro-AGW information, and suddenly, they decide to examine 169 years of surface temperature data and reading, now suddenly, I’m hearing that it’s political, a waste of money and not needed.

Funny how I never heard those thing s said about the MET before now?