re: #246 LudwigVanQuixote

Yes I do get it. I also get that because of the double standard, you refuse to call actual cases of it what it is.

I love you Ice I really do, but do you see for a moment how it is possible I find your stance hypocritical?

I pose the same question to you.

But this is the issue. Your insistence that these words are ‘calling actual cases of it what it is’. How is it possible for you not to see that this is the same justification used by any bigot to justify his own use of such words?

Jews are ok— but that soros, he’s a real ——.
Black people are dandy! Those N——s though—they’re N’s.
i love women! Just not those gutter sluts on Fox.

Even from just a feminist view, do you consider he Fox women to be a step forward or a step back for women’s rights? What hypocrisy!

Again, not the issue. You’re changing the subject again.

How does calling Foxs News women ‘gutter sluts’ advance the cause of women’s rights?
If you think Fox news is bad for women’s rights, and they are, it’s because they push a misogynistic agenda (anti-woman policies). Not because they have ‘gutter sluts’ hosting their show, or because women ‘use their sexuality’ to sell that agenda.

And please don’t talk about “just” disagreeing either.

I just dissagree with you about appropriate language to describe something ugly.

I, and you and Jimmah do a lot more than just disagree with the agenda these women are selling.

Re: bolded: I don’t think that’s all we’re disagreeing about now. BTW, I overuse the word ‘just’ a lot, FYI.