re: #63 Killgore Trout

Really? This particular article actually fills in a few blanks and the retroactive severance deal makes more sense in this context. He can rightfully claim that he wasn’t involved in the company as per that severance agreement (signed in 2002 but retroactive to 1999), but there’s still more than enough evidence showing that he was active in Bain activities throughout the period.

Whatever he hoped to get from not being associated with Bain from 1999 to 2002 isn’t going to go his way. There’s just too much showing that he was active in corporate activities for him to claim that he wasn’t responsible for corporate acts or outcomes.