re: #248 lawhawk

Except that as an appellate court judge, he’s required to find according to the law as it was then interpreted by the Supreme Court.

On the Supreme Court, you’re the final arbiter of what the law means.

There’s no problem with the manner in which Roberts decided the two cases.

WRTL vs. FEC was a Supreme Court Case. With Roberts acting as Chief Justice. Care to offer another explanation?