re: #19 recusancy

Ethics aside. It wouldn’t be smart. You’ll just insight twice the amount of people who were in the buildings who may have not been sympathetic to the cause or on the fence. If that building was in a vacuum and there would be no collateral damage, go for it. Otherwise, not smart.

Many people fail to see the other side of the arguement. If one makes it a point to engage and pursue the enemy, striking at them at every chance, many people will also decide its not worth the risk to themselves or people they know to join up.