re: #254 Gus 802

It went in the wrong direction. Possibly reduced the amounts of dishonorable discharges but I think they do so by coercing those they charge as being gay. If you fight it then it become a dishonorable. To be honest I really am not familiar with the legal history. I’ve seen that before DADT it meant interrogations, lie detectors and a dishonorable discharge.

So DADT was at least microscopically better, right?